Micro and Macro harms of Neoliberalism through the lens of violent and structural crime.
Day after day, the wider media issue reports on violent
crimes, with a heavy focus on knife crime. It can be argued that the way in
which violent crime is reported in the media focuses on pointing the blame on
race, age, gender and the local communities in which they are immersed into.
This blog aims to explore these narratives and to point out that the
representation of violent crime, in the media is often misguided and does not
truly reflect the reality as well as exploring central social structures and political
philosophies which need to be held to account as well.
On Monday April 1st, 2019, BBC News published a
headline on their website titled, - ‘Schools and NHS could be held accountable
over Youth Crime’. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47768631
The article discussed the ways in which schools and the NHS
have ‘failed’ to prevent youth groups falling into violent crime. First, this
article is blatant evidence that the wider media are not willing to accept that
the Policy implemented by the Government has been destructive and a facilitator
to these acts of violence, Secondly the article suggests that violent crime is
wholly an issue relating to youth and race. Additionally, this is a clear
example of where Neoliberalism and the values it possesses have been enshrined
and not held accountable.
However, this blog aims to look beyond the statistics as
they are presented to us in the news and wider media, and to examine the
political philosophies and values which arguably have both directly and
indirectly caused the levels of violence in society we are seeing now, and to
examine the media’s role in these misrepresentations and inaccuracies.
Harvey (2005) interprets neoliberalism as a theory of
liberation whereby individualism, autonomy, free markets and free trade is
promoted and encouraged by the state through the lens of Capitalism. Harvey (2005) also mentions that a neoliberal
state is responsible for producing, maintaining and protecting this structural
framework. It is argued by Thorsen and Lie
(2006) that we are living in an ‘age of neoliberalism’ an age of autonomy and
collective individualism. It can be argued in this case that we see a rise of
social capital and aspirational values which are entrenched in our mainstream
society and values. To contextualise this debate, it is interesting to explore
the values of the education system. You are told that you can achieve this
career, with this money that you will legitimately earn, and all will be well. However,
it can be argued that these aspirational values have been made unattainable,
especially for minority groups who face marginalisation and social exclusion
both on the micro and macro levels.
According to Bakkali (2017), many ‘gangs’ are constructed
and perceived through the lens of a moral panic. Bakkali identifies that groups of collective
individuals are formed as a method of having an identity and a way in which to
gain higher levels of social capital, which have otherwise been made
unattainable through legitimate means. However, Austerity and intrusive methods
of policing have resulted in what Bakkali refers to as a ‘listening gap’. This
means that there has been an ever-widening gap of understanding between the
Police and these ‘gangs’.
This displays a destructive cycle, starting right at the top
of the chain at the hands of the Government. When the Conservatives came into
power in 2010, they began a policy of cuts to public spending and investment.
According to the Guardian (2018) https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/31/slashing-youth-services-tories-betrayed-generation-labour-legal-requirement,
the YMCA conducted research which found that overall spending on youth centres
and service in England has dropped by £737 million (62%) since the 2010
Coalition. This has resulted in 600 youth centres closed, 3,500 youth workers
out of work and 140,000 places for young people on youth projects disappearing.
There is a common theme of deprivation within ‘working class’ communities in
the UK. The ever-widening gap between the aspirations pushed by Neoliberalism
and its rate of attainability could be argued a driving factor as to why we are
seeing a rise in violence on the streets. These statistics show that the cuts
made by Conservative policy has left a detrimental effect on these communities,
yet the blame is still being placed on the Police, Schools and NHS, all of whom
have faced extreme levels of cuts which have left them ill equipped to manage
the rise in violent crime that we are seeing.
Hall and Wilson (2014)
describe the way in which society is turning as ‘competitive individualism’.
This is a reference to the rise of socio-economic inequalities and competition
which arguably has stemmed from neoliberal values. This displays evidence to
suggest that the rise in autonomous values have meant that individuals are
becoming left behind through unattainability and social/economic
marginalisation. The natural response to this is to form social alliances and
unity through what we now construct as ‘gangs’ and gang behaviour.
It is Important to establish that exploring through the lens
of serial killers, is an extreme and unique way of exploring and signifying
wider trends of inter-personal violence within contemporary society. Lynes
(2018) argues that the growth of liberal capitalism has had a role to play in
the disintegration of socio-economic marginalised groups. Empirically, the
result of what we have seen through the drive of marketization and capitalism
is the formation of ‘non places’. Hall (2014). Lynes (2018) argues that this
environment has allowed the rise of serial killers and violent offenders to
surface through the perspective of social exclusion and marginalisation.
From this empirical evidence, the way in which we understand
violence is not wholly its reality. There are deeply entrenched structural,
social and philosophical issues which have been pushed to the frontline of our
society but have not been held accountable. It can be argued that the
Government and wider media do not want the impacts of neoliberalism and
consumer capitalism to be blamed, as this would undermine and critique their
policy. Instead it is a lot easier to point the blame at marginalised groups
and to say this is their problem within their own communities. From empirical
understanding, it can be argued that is makes sense as to why the media focus
so heavily on constructions such as ‘black on black’ violence, and pinpointing
increased responsibility and accountability onto Schools, the NHS and the
Police, all of whom have faced detrimental cutbacks.
References:
Bakkali Y (2018) life on road: symbolic struggle and the
munpain, University of Sussex, Sussex.
Coughlan S (2019) Schools and NHS could be held accountable
over Youth Crime, available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47768631, date accessed: Friday 12th
April 2019.
Hall S and Wilson D (2014)- New foundations:
pseudo-pacification and special liberty as potential cornerstones for a
multilevel theory of homicide and serial murder, European Journal of
Criminology, Vol 1, pp651.
Harvey D (2005) - A brief history of Neoliberalism, Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
Lynes A, Kelly C, Uppal P (2018), Benjamin’s Flaneur and
serial murder- an ultra-realist literary case study of Levi Bellfield- SAGE
Journals, Vol 1 pp2,8,9.
Smith C (2018), by
slashing youth services, the Tories have betrayed a generation, Available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/31/slashing-youth-services-tories-betrayed-generation-labour-legal-requirement
date accessed: Monday 15th April 2019.
Thorsen E.D and Lie A (2006) ‘What is Neoliberalism, Research
Gate. Vol 1, p1.
Treadwell J, Hall S, Winlow S (2012), shopocalypse now: consumer
culture and the English Riots of 2011, British Journal of Criminology vol 1.
Comments
Post a Comment